How Elections Change Our Perception of Loved Ones

How Elections Change Our Perception of Loved Ones

After last night’s election, I think there’s a question worth asking. Why does finding out how someone voted sometimes change the way we see them?

We disagree with people we love all the time. Most of those disagreements don’t make us go back and rethink the relationship. But after an election, you can find yourself looking at someone you’ve known for years and wondering how well you know them. Sometimes all it takes is seeing what they were willing to make a joke about.

I’m interested in what happens in that moment, because I think it tells us something about what we expect from the people closest to us.

What Did You Think I Had at Stake?

One reason we usually don’t talk openly about religion and politics is because of how deeply people can feel about both. Have you ever been cool with someone and then found out that your political views are total opposites? That experience can either be fascinating or jarring.

Two people can care about each other and have very different ideas about what an election means. One person may have voted with the cost of living in mind. The other may be worried about whether a family member will still be able to get the care they need. Both can explain why their concern mattered. The harder conversation is whether they understood why it mattered to the other person.

I think this is where some of the hurt comes from. We expect people who know us well to think about how something might affect us. That expectation is part of what makes closeness feel different from any other relationship. A stranger can dismiss your concern and you might keep scrolling. When somebody you trust does it, you may find yourself wondering if you can still go to them when you’re scared or need help.

“Everybody is entitled to their opinion” is true. It also leaves out a lot of what people are trying to say when they tell you an election felt personal.

How Much Can a Vote Tell You About a Person?

I think we can get this wrong in both directions. We can decide one vote tells us everything we need to know about somebody. We can also use years of good history with them to explain away something that genuinely bothered us.

What makes more sense to me is to look at the vote, what the person actually said, and how they’ve treated you over time. Those are three different pieces of information. If somebody voted differently and you’ve never heard them explain why, there’s probably more to learn. If you’ve heard them repeatedly make fun of a concern you’ve already explained to them, that matters too.

There’s another question I’d ask myself here. Have I been willing to hear what they thought was at stake? I can take my own concerns seriously and still be curious about how somebody else came to their decision. What they tell me might make the difference easier to understand. It might also make clear that the disagreement goes deeper than I thought.

What Happens After the Disagreement?

With Thanksgiving coming up, some people are probably already deciding whether to bring any of this up. I understand the appeal of leaving politics alone for one afternoon. You might want to eat, see your family, and enjoy some time together. But if the election brought up something that’s bothered you for years, getting through dinner peacefully may leave you with the same question you had when you walked in.

One thing I’d pay attention to is how the person responds when you tell them why it bothered you. Someone can disagree with you and still take your concern seriously. They can ask what you’re worried about and listen long enough to understand your answer. That may sound like a small thing, but it tells you something about whether you can be honest with each other when you see things differently.

If last night changed how you see someone, I’d start by asking what changed. Did you learn something about what they value? Did the way they talked about the election bother you? Or did it bring up something you’ve had a hard time saying to them for a while?

The answer might tell you more about what you need from the relationship than another conversation about who won.

The election may have given you a reason to ask a question that was already there. Can I tell this person what matters to me and trust them to take it seriously, even when they see things differently? Sometimes the answer is yes, and you’ve been putting off a conversation that could bring you closer. Sometimes you’ve had that conversation enough times to know the answer. Either way, I think it’s worth being honest about what you’ve learned. You can love somebody and still have to rethink how much of yourself you feel comfortable sharing with them.

Facts versus Opinions

I’m an introvert and a very introspective person. That’s no secret to those who really know me.

Most of the time when I go out with people I find myself sitting back, watching and listening. It may seem like I am not engaged in the conversation, when in actuality, I’m probably more engaged than the people talking.

It’s fascinating. I enjoy doing it. I can do this for hours and not say a word, yet am totally absorbed in the entire conversation, not just what is being said, but how it is said and the true meaning behind it.

I’m listening, analyzing, watching mannerisms, expressions, analyzing those. Listening to speech patterns and tones while all the while analyzing the entire conversation.

I learn a lot about people this way, and about myself. That’s why one of my favorite quotes, I forgot where I got it from, is “I hear what is not being said.”

This brings me to tonight.

Tonight I was telling a story and got rudely interrupted in the beginning of the story by two of my friends who felt the need to voice their opinions as if they were facts, before even hearing the entire story.

I sat back, listened to them, analyzing everything, and waiting to see if they would be courteous enough to ask me to continue my story, but they never did. They were so high up on their self-righteous, egotistical horses, that they never came back to my story.

Some people would have found this rude, I found it a bit irritating, but mostly, I found it intriguing because I was learning so much about these people and how they think, even how they think and see me. I was learning more than I think they knew they were teaching me about themselves, which is the beauty of extrospection.

As I sat and listened, I realized that my two friends were making a mistake a lot of us make from time to time, especially in this political environment. They were mistaking their opinions for facts.

Naturally, we are drawn to information that supports our beliefs. Sadly we tend to stick with those beliefs even in the face of evidence that proves them wrong, and may even believe in them more, as a form of protest or as a defense mechanism.

In many cases, factual evidence seems to matter very little.

As I watch the political coverage, this is played out daily, but one doesn’t have to watch CNN or MSNBC to see this. We encounter this all the time, perhaps even within ourselves as I encountered with my friends tonight.

At one point when they were closing the restaurant we were at and we were the only customers left, they were still engaged in idle conversation, sipping their drinks as the staff was waiting for us to leave.

I told my friends that we should probably pick up the pace, but they told me I should just relax. I replied that I like for people to be respectful of my time and I like to respect other peoples time.

They quickly retorted that we were patrons, paying money and that they would gladly wait for us because we were given them business. They then went on a rampage that included something about the economy and the customer is always right, to which as always, I just listened and analyzed and then replied that I was sharing my opinion, not stating a fact.

They then backed off, but I realized that they were stating their opinions as blatant facts, that as long as a drink was on the table, the business should wait patiently for them to leave.

I didn’t try to elaborate on this with them, because like I stated earlier, even if I could present facts on why we should be respectful of the staffs time and leave so that they could clear the last table, I would have been met with more opinionated hostility, but why?

We all know what it feels like to be proven wrong and what that means to our sense of self and even our sense of credibility. It often gets us to question not just that one thing, but a host of our other beliefs and one thing many people are afraid of doing, and will sometimes fight to death before they do it, is to take a real examination of their self.

Many relationships fail or stall because one or both partners have different opinions and neither one is willing to reconsider, change or even tweak theirs. Instead they fight over and over about the same things, pointing the finger at each other.

These are of course largely unconscious thoughts, which make them that much more powerful. Still, stating opinions doesn’t make them right or facts.

People who are more self-confident tend to be more willing to re-examine their opinions and it’s important that fro time to time we all do this to become well-rounded, well-adjusted people who are able to have healthy relationships with not only other people, but with ourselves.